Last week, I stood in my kitchen staring at my phone, scrolling through food options, thumb moving faster than my brain. I sighed, leaned against the counter, and muttered, “Hmm.” Every recommendation looked great. Five stars. Popular nearby. Ordered by people who seemed very sure of themselves.
Ten minutes later, I was still hungry and somehow more tired than before.
My wife walked in, watched me for a second, and said, “You know you could have made an omelette by now, right?”
She was right. I put the phone down, rubbed the back of my neck, and laughed. The tool had answers. I still had no idea what I wanted.
That moment stuck with me. Not because of dinner, but because of the expectation behind it. Somewhere along the way, I had assumed the tool would do the thinking for me. And when it didn’t, I felt oddly frustrated, like it had failed at a job it was never meant to do.
Why Tools Feel Like Relief
We do this all the time now. Tools feel like relief. Whew. Someone else has handled it. The options are laid out. The decision looks cleaner. You can almost feel your shoulders drop when an answer appears on the screen.
AI is especially good at this. It summarizes faster than we can read. It suggests faster than we can debate. It gives you something that looks complete, polished, and confident.
I have caught myself leaning back in my chair thinking, “Okay, that’s settled,” far sooner than I should have. And then, a few seconds later, thinking, wait… no… actually, that’s exactly when I should slow down.
Where Thinking Actually Begins
Real thinking is not smooth. It is uncomfortable. It shows up as a pause. A frown. A moment where you stare at the ceiling and go, “Ugh, something about this feels off.”
Some of the most important decisions I have made did not arrive with clarity. They arrived with tension. Data pointed one way. Experience whispered another. I remember sitting at my desk, tapping a pen, thinking, “This makes sense on paper… so why am I hesitating?”
No tool flagged that hesitation. Years of living with consequences did.
Judgment Lives in Context, Not Outputs
Judgment does not live in dashboards. It lives in context. In memory. In pattern recognition shaped by people, timing, and consequences that are hard to measure.
You cannot automate that. You cannot outsource it. You earn it by making decisions and feeling what happens next.
At Ergode, we use tools constantly. They help us move faster. They help us see more. But the decisions that really matter still happen in rooms where someone leans forward, takes a breath, and says, “Let’s slow this down for a second.”
Those seconds feel expensive. They are also the ones that save you later.
The Quiet Risk of Borrowed Thinking
There is another risk that does not get talked about enough.
When people rely on tools long enough, they slowly stop forming opinions. I have seen people nod along to outputs without questioning them, hands folded, expression calm, responsibility quietly shifting elsewhere.
“I followed the recommendation” is a very comfortable sentence. I have said it myself. It is also a dangerous one.
Tools should support thinking, not replace it. The moment they become the authority instead of the assistant, something important slips away.
What Still Belongs to Humans
Creativity. Judgment. Intuition. Responsibility.
These are not inefficiencies waiting to be solved. They are the point. AI will keep getting better. Faster. Smarter. That part is inevitable.
Thinking is not optional.
So here is the question I find myself coming back to, often with a small sigh and a longer pause.
When a tool gives you an answer that feels very convenient, are you accepting it because it is right, or because it lets you stop thinking sooner than you should?
That difference is where real leadership still lives.
Regards,
Rupesh
Cloverbites By Rupesh Sanghavi 
Leave a Reply